Sourcing Shangri-La

The Patchwork Enterprise

The enterprise of the future looks something like patchwork.  In a good sense.  Patchwork quilts can be beautiful, blending diversity into a coherent whole - and uniquely distinctive. Often it’s collaboration by a group of quilters that creates them. And they’re not just great art. They keep you warm. They deliver.

Outsourcing is becoming ever more pervasive as globalization drives further specialization. In the villages of our forebears, people came to specialize in baking bread, or working with leather, or shodding plowhorses. In our global village too, it doesn't make sense to do in-house what someone else can do better or cheaper.

Outsourcing was once focussed on ‘non-core’ activities. Now everything – from R&D through manufacturing and supply chain to customer experience analytics – can be outsourced, and increasingly is.

In this patchwork future, successful enterprises will mirror the best quilting groups: a clear vision, creative collaboration and the means to make decisions. In other words, a well-defined operating model and a framework for effective collaboration that brings everyone's creativity into its execution. 

Patchwork has another, negative, connotation of course: ‘a hodge podge’. 

I worked with a multinational client once, leveraging Nimbus to bring multiple HR outsourcing contracts into one coherent whole. That end-to-end perspective exposed the multiple gaps between the expectations of the service providers and the retained organization. Non trivial gaps too.  One was an immediate threat to the entire expatriate payroll. 

That's the hodge podge kind of patchwork enterprise, and it has a very limited future. No-one’s going to want to work with, or buy from, a patchwork enterprise where the patterns and colors don’t match, and you can see the stitching - even worse, the gaps.

Some organizations are trying to stitch their multisourced reality together, buying in 'managed governance services' and the like from the Big 4.  But ultimately it demands holistic thinking, discipline and a platform to support it. Much like quilting.

 

Related Posts

07 Jan 2013    Cloud Without Risk: Pie In The Sky

13 Dec 2012    The Universal Business Language: Process

© Text Michael Gammage 2013

Outsourcing's Secret Sauce

Deloitte's report Outsourcing, Today and Tomorrow, just published, attempts to define the secret sauce for outsourcing. The authors are engagingly frank:

"We wish we could wrap up this paper with a pithy summary of the secrets of effective outsourcing, boiled down into a neat list of easy-to-digest bullet points. Unfortunately, if such secrets exist, no one has yet discovered them."

But they go on to suggest 'one possible candidate' for outsourcing's secret sauce:

"The recognition that outsourcing, like other complex business practices, is a discrete business discipline requiring specialized skills that cannot easily be developed on the fly."

Which may be true - let's agree it's one of the essential spices - but it overlooks an essential ingredient, arguably the foundation for outsourcing's secret sauce: a platform for effective collaboration, which surely lies at the heart of successful outsourcing.

This platform provides a common language: end-to-end process, expressed in the language of the business, not IT-speak. It is comprehensive, not just IT-oriented. It provides integrated perspectives, not just a repository of process fragments. It is wrapped within a robust governance framework to enable process stakeholders - across the enterprise and including especially IT - to effectively manage change. And, crucially, it enables deployment to process users in a way that is personalised, intuitive and engaging.

The Deloitte report - which polled 100+ sourcing professionals earlier this year - provides ample evidence that this need for a common language, a framework for more effective collaboration, is real and growing:

Outsourcing is big - a $480bn industry this year - and set to expand. So too is offshoring.  But operational roles and responsibilities are often amazingly unclear. [There is far too much focus simply on contractual negotiations]

Cloud will vastly increase its complexity. [as will Social, Mobile and Big Data] 

Churn is increasing: half of clients have terminated contracts for convenience, sometimes to insource, most often to re-outsource. [Managing complex dynamic multisourced service delivery environments is becoming the norm]

Innovation and sustainable success in continuous improvement can't work without it. [Innovation and continuous improvement is the area where organizations report that they are least effective in working with service providers]. 

 

Related Posts

21 Aug 2012    How To Simplify Global Shared Services

20 Jun 2012    Process: The Emerging Global Business Language

Future of BPM? We're In Mesopotamia 3000BC

Adam Deane has set off a discussion on his blog on BPM Visions Of The Future.

My own view is that we are witnessing a revolution in process thinking.  It's similar to the transformation that took place around 3000BC when humankind moved from hieroglyphs to phonetic writing.  It is that breakthrough which makes possible this blog - and poetry and tax returns.

That transformation - the adoption of phonetic writing - too was driven by business needs.  The emerging societies of that time needed governance. Writing was simply the most efficient way to record and report, to establish the bureaucracy upon which control depended.

It was also a global transformation.  Writing seems to have emerged independently in Egypt, China and Central America - but the best evidence we have today comes from Mesopotomia, simply because they used baked clay tablets, which have lasted far better than paper or bamboo. This tablet from Mesopotamia, from the British Museum collection, records the allocation of rations to workers (in the form of beer, an early local currency).

Process is undergoing a parallel transformation. Until recently, process has been about technical symbols, focussed on automation, and intended to be used only by a few.

In the future, process will surely be the universal business language. But it will be holistic, not just focussed on systems. It will be integrated, not just process fragments stored in a common repository. And it will be in the language of the business, so that everyone can understand it - and get involved in continuously improving it.

In short, process will become a polite term. Folks with MBAs won't feel embarrassed to use it. We'll no longer have two terms - process and value chain  -for the same thing.  And it will be inclusive, stimulating a richer and ongoing collaborative dialog: the CIO will sit down with the business user.

And the essential enterprise enabler for all this - the 21st century equivalent of the bureacracy perhaps - will be the process management platform:

... it will integrate process with documents, KPI metrics, risk and controls, quality and compliance,  training and task support.  

... it will provide the collaborative framework and governance that enables process stakeholders, and Lean and Six Sigma teams, to drive performance improvement.

... and it will deliver all this to the desktops and smartphones of people doing real work - in the form of Storyboards and a personalized intelligent operations manual. 

Which is why I count myself thankful to work in such an exciting area.  Phonetic writing gave rise to enormous creativity. You couldn't be reading that blockbuster on your Kindle without it.  As enterprises become more virtual, more outsourced, more socially responsible, more complex and with ever more global supply chains, we will need ever more creativity in the workplace.  And business process management will be a crucial enabler. 

This post inspired by A History Of The World In 100 Objects by Neil MacGregor. Highly recommended (an ideal Christmas present, if you can bear to let it go)

PS you don't have to wait! First editions of the process management platform of the future are available here ;-)

Related Posts

02 Nov 2011    Toxic Processes: Social, Cloud, Agility - And Risk

10 Oct 2011    The BPM Story Line: Tragedy or Comedy?

11 Aug 2011    Why Management 2.0 Will Be Built Upon BPM

Dude - Did You Ever Read This Back?

When HfS Research and PwC issued their rambling Global Business Services report in July, I assumed it was a one-off, rushed into print before the vacations.

But their joint report The Three Tenets of Global Business Services Execution - released yesterday but dated October - blows away that theory. 

It's not just verbose and boring. Much of it seems close to nonsense.  The opening sentence is typical: 

"While global sourcing has long been recognized as a complex activity, solutions have matured in a variety of categories that are frequently addressed as part of a Global Business Services strategy."

OK, I've only been working with clients in this space for a few years, but I have no idea what this means.

It seems a bit churlish to criticise a free report.  But other folks, equally well qualified to comment, are publishing reports for free that are simply much better written - Accenture's report last month, for instance.     

It's a pity because there's some good ideas buried under the wordage. But most of the thinking is confused, and, for my money, misses one crucial point: that process management - what Accenture terms the essential 'service management framework' - is central to success.

Disclosure - I spent six happy years at PwC's predecessors - at a time when text like this would have resulted in a court-martial ;-)

Related Posts

27 Oct 2011    How Not To Implement Shared Services

13 Oct 2011    Placing A Big Bet On Global Shared Services

 

Value Chain Or Process? The Costs Of Confusion

Here's a conundrum. Listening to Paul Harmon of BP Trends on Becoming A Process-Centric Organization yesterday, I fell to wondering...

How can it be that process maturity is good (which CEO wouldn't want flawless execution and a culture of continuous improvement?) - and yet, by whichever scale we choose, most organizations are pitifully low-scoring, and only a handful of the Fortune 2000 are at, say, CMMI Level 5?

One of the biggest barriers to higher levels of process literacy - and to wider C-Level engagement - must be confusion.  The false distinction between value chain and process perfectly illustrates this.

Let me make a claim which some will consider heretical.   Value chains (and value streams) are the same thing as end-to-end processes.  They have a different provenance, and vocabulary, but their purpose is identical: they provide a framework for collaboration on performance improvement.

I see nothing in Wikipedia's description of value chains that Nimbus clients are not already doing in their business process management programs.  Paul Harmon used the two terms interchangeably in his hour-long discussion - as indeed many others do.  

It's not just that we have two ways for describing the same thing.  If you call it eggplant and I call it aubergine, then it's confusing, and does nothing to help us collaborate in the kitchen, but as long as we are both aware that they are exactly the same thing, there's no harm done.

But we're well beyond simple confusion because all sorts of folks have created 'competing' methodologies and vocabularies. There are Value Chain and Value Stream frameworks and methodologies, with Lean and Six Sigma variants, that seem to be quite separate from everyday process improvement.  Whereas, to all intents and purposes, they are all doing the same thing.  

This confusion matters. It's a fruitless distinction in a world which is often already ridiculously complex. At the C-Level, it sounds like a cacophany of voices competing for mindshare.  Whereas the truth is that all of them are about building capability to manage the enterprise in a new dimension: end-to-end process, or value chain, or value stream - call it what you will.  

Tim Leach, Director of Competitive Excellence at Northrop Grumman, speaking at IP11, described the reality for many organizations when he said (of the situation at Northrop Grumman before adopting Nimbus Control) :

"How could it be that we have 7,000 people trained in Six Sigma and Lean yielding so little in terms of sustainable cost reductions and service improvement?"

If we want wider process literacy, and wider C-Level leadership in building process maturity, we have to fuse the existing disparate and apparently 'competing' approaches.  The start point must be to standardize our vocabulary.

I doubt that the UN or the US Supreme Court is going to take this up and make a definite pronouncement, so it's up to us.  Value chains have a proud heritage - but in reality they are about understanding and optimizing end-to-end processes.  Simplicity demands that we choose one or the other. 

No disrespect to Michael Porter, but I favor the wider adoption of process over value chain, and here's some reasons why.

End-to-end business process...

dovetails with compliance. Risks and controls, quality and compliance, can all be integrated within the business process management platform

can be integrated with real-time performance metrics, so process improvement opportunities can be more immediately identified

is the language of outsourcing and shared services, which are rapidly transforming the back-office of every organization

bridges the IT divide and enables business-led systems implementation

can be integrated with documents, systems and training - and delivered as a personalized intelligent operations manual to every desktop and mobile device.

Even better - there are already proven enterprise process management platforms, which provide a complete collaborative framework and governance to enable top-down process re-engineering as well as bottom-up continuous improvement - and they are becoming more widely adopted.

Process literacy is growing. The idea of process excellence is gaining currency.  Process maturity models such as CMMI are gaining ground, and even becoming mandatory in some public sector procurement. Let's go with process and get far wider engagement, at C-Level and across the enterprise, in performance improvement.  Let's embrace the Global Process Owner role now found in some visionary organizations - and expect that it will increasingly be recognized as a senior management leadership role. 

Related Posts

02 Nov 2011    Toxic Processes: Social, Cloud, Agility - and Risk

20 Sep 2011    BPM - The Foundation For Operational Excellence

 

The Process SOP Blues

It seems very odd at first. Why should Life Sciences organizations be so resistant to a change that is so self-evidently valuable? Why push back on something that makes things better, faster and cheaper? 

Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) are the basic building block of Life Sciences organizations. Almost always simply a library of lengthy documents, SOPs set out how the organization understands what it does; how it assures itself and its clients and its regulators that it is following Good Practice.

Even in the best managed Pharma organizations, the costs of compliance can be 16% of operating costs; more typically, they will be 20%+ and may even be towards 30% of operating costs.

So - if there was a better way of managing SOPs, how can there be such indifference? How could smart people be so unenthusiastic about a new way of working that would, say, make clinical trials safer while, at the same time, reducing their cost?

At the European SOP conference yesterday, the evidence from several speakers - none of them linked to Nimbus - was compelling: in many ways, some serious, SOPs don't work:

Susan Ollier from QED Clinical Services noted that SOPs may be missing, or contradictory, or out-of-date or uncontrolled. 

Steve Nicholas from PharmaAcademy presented supporting evidence from the UK's MHRA regulator. He went on to point out that the SOP document fails because is written to meet two mutually incompatible objectives. SOPs are supposed to be concise and easily understood (to support the process user), while at the same time being an exhaustive training document for a new starter with no experience. 

Gareth Turner from PAREXEL noted that 'a lot of what we do is actually quite simple. We've just created a way of making it extraordinarily complex. We need to get back to simplicity.' 

The answer, the future for SOPs that was served up in different ways by different speakers, is to adopt a process-based approach. 

Going beyond document-based SOPs to thinking in terms of end-to-end process can offer huge advantages. It's the kind that would grab any CEO's attention:  

Risk Management - it exposes the gaps and the overlaps that arise from silo-based SOPs. It also provides a comprehensive framework for managing outsourced activities. 

Productivity- it makes work easier. Storyboards deliver content, in an easily digestible format, through a personalized intelligent operations manual.  And it enables more extensive, and successful, automation.

Governance - it brings together Quality, the QMS and all compliance activities into an integrated management platform.  

Performance Improvement - it connects SOPs with KPI metrics.  It integrates Quality and compliance with Lean, Six Sigma and other performance improvement programs.

At the Nimbus Inspiring Performance 2011 conference, Novartis shared a brilliant example of an organization that is forging this future, leveraging Nimbus Control to create a smart, holistic perspective on its clinical trials programs.  

So WHY is the progress towards process-based SOPs so incredibly slow? It's a question I've never satisfactorily answered until yesterday when the penny dropped. I realised that people's resistance to a process perspective is not job-protection or an inability to think creatively.  It's because whenever they are shown process (and we saw many examples of this yesterday) it looks awful.

They know process as swimlanes, pools and numerous symbols (ie the language of BPMN). They see it as technical, in the IT domain, with no sense of design.  They see governance processes separate from operational processes. They see process as bottom-up fragments of understanding. So process for them is a loaded and negative term. Presented like this, who would want to use it? It's really no surprise that they push back and switch off.  

I wasn't the only one bored, I think. I found this rap on a scrap of paper as I left the conference:

 

 

Related Posts

05 Apr 2011    Integrated Compliance Cuts Operating Costs By 9%

11 Aug 2011    Why Management 2.0 Will Be Built Upon BPM

  

Toxic Processes: Social, Cloud, Agility - and Risk

There's a looming crisis that's being driven by the headlong rush into Cloud, Social  and Big Data in pursuit of the Agility agenda. Like the financial crisis, the signs are clearly evident well ahead of the crash.  And just like every actor in that sorry tale was acting rationally within the confines of their silo, so too this time everyone's busy.

At the heart of the financial crash was the accumulation, over many years, of  toxic assets purchased in vast quantities by over-leveraged banks. The risks were not clearly visible or understood.

On the smaller scale, many global enterprises are busy working on their own sub-prime crisis. They are relying on toxic processes. As a result, their risks are not clearly visible or understood.    

Organizations are rapidly building a future that is far more virtual, where an empowered workforce manages service delivery operations that are far more complex, fast-paced, and largely outsourced.

Cloud promises the frictionless enterprise.

Social promises employee engagement and the capability to turn on a sixpence.

Sourcing and supply chain innovation promises low costs and rapid response.

Within each program silo - Cloud, Social, Sourcing - it makes perfect sense. It's the agility that CEOs are looking for. But this new level of agility comes with new levels of risk. Two examples:

The complexity of existing supply chains  makes them vulnerable. Car production was halted in several factories around the world when the Japanese tsunami struck the remote Tohoku region: it turns out that the Renesas plant there produces 40% of the world's microcontrollers. Building resilient global supply chains will require even more complexity. The increasing adoption of outsourced services from multiple suppliers - the growing virtualization of the enterprise - will exacerbate this complexity, and therefore the vulnerability.  

In customer relationship management, IBM's Global CMO Study, out this week, shows CMOs living in a world of high complexity and unpredictable interdependencies. It calls out customer intimacy as a strategic goal for CMOs. But it's to be delivered as rapid response in a world of real-time social media by empowered employees - many of them working for outsourcing partners - dealing with empowered customers, and by complex, rapidly-changing, business rules applied to Big Data.  So much higher levels of complexity and therefore vulnerability.

It's easy to get carried away with the potential benefits in Cloud and Social (and Big Data). But the execution risks are correspondingly high - and largely overlooked. In complex, fast-paced and global organizations, increasing agility correlates with increasing risk. 

Business process management is unglamorous next to Cloud, Social, Big Data and Agility.  But a BPM platform is the essential foundation for success.  The first step in mitigating risk is transparency. (It's also the key to unlocking potential innovation as well, of course).   

Pause please while I step up to my soapbox again. The BPM platform that can leverage Cloud, Social, Big Data fully, while properly managing risk, must have three fundamentals:

Holistic perspective. This means visibility of the enterprise that is complete, integrated, rigorous and realtime.  Transparency here is like the capability to run a three-dimensional CT Scan for the enterprise at any time.

Effective collaboration. That means a common language, across the internal functional silos and the extended enterprise. The only plausible language is end-to-end process - but, and this is critical, in the language of the business, not IT-speak, to ensure shared understanding.  It also requires a governance framework that is robust but practical, otherwise collaborative innovation will stall, or undermine risk management.

Ubiquity. It must connect strategy directly with operational reality across the enterprise. There's a compliance gap if the enterprise process model is simply an abstract managed by IT or the Quality function. It has to support real people in getting real work done.  So it needs to be personalized, and deployed to desktops and mobile devices as easy-to-consume process content.  This ensures the real-world integrity of the process model. It also engages the workforce and so channels Social to where it's most productive: fostering continuous improvement within the process context.      

Some organizations recognize these risks - we are seeing new levels of interest in a BPM platform that can deliver this capability - but most don't yet. Some put their faith in complete and 'perfect' IT process models - but they focus only on what's automated, and are understood only by a handful of people. Most organizations rely on incomplete, duplicated and overlapping process fragments in a variety of tools and formats, and with no governance beyond email.  Either way, IT models or myriad fragments, these are toxic processes.

If we continue our current trajectory, Gartner's prediction earlier this year that ten global companies will be toppled within three years by basic process defects looks safe.

Related Posts

31 Oct 2011    The Socially Optimized Business - And Process

30 Sep 2011    Optimize 15,000 Business Controls? No Problem

 

The Socially Optimized Business - And Process

I love the positive energy and openness of the Dachis Group and the Social Business Council - their one page graphic summarising Attributes of a Socially Optimized Business can be downloaded here - so I don't want to be picky.  But there's a flaw in their manifesto - at least, as I understand it - that may seem nerdy but is, I think, actually quite crucial.

I've huge sympathy for the call for a Renaissance in business:

"After decades of mechanistic, dehumanizing, process-oriented management dogma, progressive organizations are waking up to the disturbing truth that they’ve squeezed all the creativity out of their business. When companies embrace organic, passionate, socially-savvy initiatives, they blossom. Who benefits? Everyone."

What worries me is the way we seem to be trashing 'process-orientation'. 

Agreed, process has for too long been articulated in the form of technical gobbledegook. And it's rarely exciting. 

But - if we express process simply and holistically, so that people across the socially optimized enterprise can understand it, then we have a universal language that can get everyone talking. 

And if we support it with an enabling process management platform, then we have:

connected the creativity with how work gets done.  So we ensure that social business is not an ivory tower, it's about engaging with everyone's ideas

the ideal framework for Lean, Six Sigma and other process improvement programs - and for sustainable continuous improvement

the governance framework that ensures collaboration will be effective, across all the functional silos and the increasingly virtual extended enterprise  (it also allows the Chief Risk Officer to sleep at night). 

Great ideas -please sign me up for the Renaissance. But let's see process as part of the solution and so make it practical.

Related Posts 

30 Sep 2011    Optimize 15,000 Business Controls? No Problem

20 Sep 2011    BPM - The Foundation For Operational Excellence

 

How Not To Implement Shared Services

A shared services center to deliver HR, finance, procurement, IT and other services for the UK's seven Research Councils. It seemed like a Good Idea when it was announced in 2006. 

Five years on, a review by the UK's National Audit Office (NAO) makes gloomy reading. Overspent £130m against a budget of £79m, and projected savings significantly less than expected. 

How did it happen? The NAO report highlights three fundamental flaws:

Lack of Clarity

"A key factor contributing to escalating costs was the early lack of clarity about how the service would operate. An outline design, known as a target operating model, was not agreed until August 2008, nearly a year after implementation had begun, but it was incomplete and lacked detail. Some elements of design were still ongoing during transition and system launch."

Confused Governance

"Early governance structures were complex. Reviews commissioned at various points during the project showed that responsibilities and accountabilities needed clarification."

Poor Management of Outsourcer

"A contract with Fujitsu to design and build the systems and ICT was "poorly managed".  It was eventually terminated at an additional cost of £13m."

Each of which could, of course, have been avoided, or at the very least mitigated, by the adoption of an appropriate process management platform.

No surprise that developing process maturity is an NAO theme - and runs through the NAO's recommendations in this case: to harmonise processes further, to strengthen end-to-end process management, and to embed continuous improvement.

Hear stories like this one, and other shockers in the Process Hall of Shame, and it's bewildering how organizations can still be in denial about the need for a process management platform at the heart of any shared services project.  As though it was a 'nice-to-have'.

Whereas actually it's the key to clarity at every level; to effective collaboration within a robust governance framework; to IT alignment; to drive process harmonization; to controlling a multisourced environment; to making life easier for the SSC workforce; and to enabling a culture of continuous improvement.

Related Posts

07 Oct 2011    Accenture: What's Holding Back Shared Services

19 May 2011    Service Integration and Process: In Six Minutes

 

Deloitte Shared Services Insights: Could Do Better

Accenture's report earlier this month did a good job in advancing the debate about shared services. By comparison, Deloitte's latest shared services insights disappoint. It's a commendable report - but it kind of misses the point.

Overlook the waffle and the sloppy thinking: Accenture's report does nail the essential truth - that a service management framework is vital for sustainable success:

There needs to be a “system around the system” that includes the people, discipline in procedures, communications, service expectations, performance measurement and key cross-functional processes, such as continuous improvement and client relationship management. It’s this broader shared services system around the system— which Accenture calls the service management framework—that sets shared services organizations that have achieved high performance apart from those with a sub-optimized centralized service delivery model. The service management framework is the keystone...

I've argued elsewhere that Accenture needs to go further and recognize that the service management framework for shared services, in its best developed and most valuable form, is the business process management platform at the heart of the enterprise. 

But, that qualification aside, the idea of the service management framework is a crucial advance and deserves to be adopted.   It provides the context by which we can understand that Deloitte's latest list of worthy insights - on the importance of change management, IT alignment, governance and enhanced controls - are in fact all inter-related.  And jointly soluble, once we frame this correctly. 

Related Posts

13 Oct 2011    Placing A Big Bet On Global Shared Services

07 Oct 2011    Accenture: What's Holding Back Shared Services

 

 

Placing A Big Bet On Global Shared Services

"The companies you work for are placing a big bet on your success. Your job is to scale fast...". Deborah Kops's presentation captured the moment at this week's Finance Summit.

Shared services is set for very rapid growth. There is a convergence around an SSOS model of shared services implementation: Stabilize - Standardize - Optimize - Source. It's a model that's driving the expansion of shared services into global business services operations, delivering not just the traditional Finance & HR services but others such as Procurement and Supply Chain - and doing all this in an increasingly multisourced mix.

Unsurprisingly, change management featured heavily, reinforcing the importance of a service management framework. One organization reported 28 change initiatives running concurrently in its P2P process alone in this FY.

The challenges are changing as shared services moves up several gears, and beyond the easy wins in automation and labor arbitrage:

Customer Satisfaction. The pre-conference survey showed service improvement was on a par with continuing cost reduction. Several SSOs are using KPIs based on the Net Promoter methodology to measure client satisfaction.

Continuous Improvement. There's an new focus on continuous improvement programs. CI was one of the delegates' top budget priorities for 2012. 

Talent Management. There's a lot more focus on people, morale, motivation, engagement and retention. 

No surprise that there was a lot of interest in Nimbus Control as a service management framework that can orchestrate complex change and enable continuous improvement.  It was in the challenges of ERP projects that the visualization of process, in the language of the business, seemed especially powerful. Stakeholders in most organizations simply don't have proper visibility of the current and future state, can't do easy gap and impact analyses, and have no governance framework, beyond email, for managing change.

My conference highlight, by the way: sharing a table with a global P2P owner spending $52bn this FY. Awesome.

Related Posts

11 Oct 2011    Continuous Improvement Made Easy

07 Oct 2011    Accenture: What's Holding Back Shared Services

 

Accenture: What's Holding Back Shared Services

Hats off to Accenture for bringing some reality and insights to the debate about what's holding back Shared Services. 

Everybody's doing shared services, everybody thinks it's strategic, yadda yadda yadda. The reality though is often disappointment and missed business cases.  Sustainable success in shared services is still the exception.

The Deloitte Shared Services survey, published in April, highlighted some lessons learned: the importance of governance, a collaborative framework, transparency and change management.   

Governance was also a theme running through the PwC/HfS report on Global Business Services, published in July: it has to be 'ongoing', 'well-integrated, consistent and rigorous' and not just another tool for vendor management.  

Those were useful contributions.  But Accenture's report this week Trends in Shared Services: Unlocking The Full Potential brings a new focus.  It spells out what the leaders are doing, and how they are succeeding. And process excellence is front and center.

Noting how one leader in shared services uses automation and metrics and process improvement specialists, it continues:  

"...while other elements are certainly in place - C-level support, comprehensive change management and a relentless focus on value - it is the organization's continued focus on process excellence that stands out ."

I share the report's enthusiasm that shared services will mature to become ubiquitous. And that we are witnessing the emergence of "a long-envisioned" model of integrated business services.  I agree too that 'managing multisourcing consistently' is a huge challenge for most organizations. And I'm delighted that Accenture highlights the vital need for a service management framework.   

But I have one quibble. Because even Accenture hasn't quite joined up the dots.

What is it, ultimately, that enables process excellence, that provides the collaborative framework for change management, that ensures transparency and IT alignment, that supports Lean and other continuous improvement programs, that provides the governance framework for the effective management of outsourcers, and that allows cloud and social media to be most effectively leveraged?  It's a business process management platform. 

It's not a panacea. It can seem a bit boring. It's an unspectacular answer when your SSC is 'in a complete mess'. But everything points to the business process management platform as the foundation for success in shared services.  It underpins process excellence. It's what enables the service management framework.  And it's the only way to optimize the management of process variants, which, the report notes, is the real problem in process standardization. 

What is the business process management platform that can do all this? I've defined it elsewhere as a platform that uses the universal language of end-to-end business process to enable four capabilities.  The only way I'd improve on that definition now, especially in the light of the Shared Services workshop in London last week, would be to re-iterate the importance of adoption.  If our brilliant process management models don't engage process stakeholders, and help real people to get real work done and to contribute to improving things , then we're missing the biggest trick of all.    

Related Posts

03 Oct 2011    Shared Services at IP11: Your Top Issues

19 May 2011    Service Integration and Process: In Six Minutes

  

Shared Services @ #IP11: Your Top Issues

 
I hesitate to use the word 'landslide' but attendees at the Shared Services workshop at IP11 last week voted decisively on their own Top 3 issues (after strongly endorsing the issues identified by the Deloitte and PwC surveys earlier this year):

(1) Managing process variants

(2) Retaining IP and strategic control where activities are outsourced

(3) Building a continuous improvement culture.

Haha - no real surprises here for regular readers! For others new to this blog, there is more on variants here, on retaining IP and control in outsourcing here, and on continuous improvement here.

Slides from the workshop are available from the conference website. Thanks to all who contributed!

Related Posts

20 Sep 2011    BPM: The Foundation Of Operational Excellence

11 Aug 2011    Why Management 2.0 Will Be Built Upon BPM

After Nimbus IP11, The Sky's The Limit

 
It seemed entirely appropriate that an extraordinary first day’s program at Nimbus IP11 closed out this evening with a stunning set from the amazing a cappella vocal group Naturally 7.

It was a day of superlatives. I lost count of the number of people, whom I’d never met before, saying, in the breaks: ’This is amazing!’. 

As one delegate put it, the Nimbus plane took off some time ago, lifted high by client enthusiasm.  And the video message from TIBCO founder and CEO, Vivek Ranadivé, who was keynoting at TUCON in Las Vegas today, confirmed that Nimbus now has an extra large powered-by-TIBCO jet engine strapped under each wing.

As ever, it was Nimbus customers who fizzed with energy. And, as usual, their candor was remarkable: this was real knowledge-sharing among pioneers in an approach to enterprise business process management that will one day be business-as-usual.

My own highlights from the stage, picked out from a packed program, would be...

Tim Leach from Northrop Grumman, on the challenge of bringing together the insights of 23k people (many of them actually rocket scientists, he laughingly pointed out) and aligning them in the cause of continuous improvement. If Northrop Grumman can assemble all the parts for the most advanced aerospace equipment, and keep them aligned so the plane can fly, then why is it such a challenge to get people aligned and flying in formation?  How could it be that having 7k people trained in Six Sigma and Lean was yielding so little in terms of sustainable cost reductions and service improvement? The answer: bring their work together into a single process repository, within a single process architecture, and connect that with how people get real work done. “Our failure”, he said,”was that we tried to build it ourselves. After 18 months we found Nimbus, and that was an immediate 85% of the solution.”

Richard Miller from Marathon Oil, manager of a platform in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea that cost $3bn to build, costs $160m to operate every year – and that pumps $1.6m of oil and gas per day, when everything is working properly. After a Nimbus Control implementation that has successfully enabled a major in-sourcing exercise, and a re-implementation of SAP: "The thing I notice", he said,"is that things are becoming much more predictable. Not just in planning work and the delivery of materials, but right across the business."   

Darren Anderson, Principal Solution Architect for Sony, based in Tokyo, steering Sony's global SAP program (which is his 32nd major SAP implementation), and striving to ensure that process is at its heart. "We had this realization - I knew this but could never vocalize it - that end-to-end process is what we have to focus on." That realization had enabled Sony's European business to reduce the timeline for delivery of an SAP program from two years to just one. "The critical success factor was Nimbus: working around one process. I want the business to be thinking about how to improve the process, not have to think about changes to SAP. Nimbus Control has the potential to accelerate our global program, and to help us win in the marketplace by being One Sony."  

Gregory Reynolds, Head of the BPM Center of Excellence at Nestlé, described as a 'no-brainer' the final decision, after an exhaustive evaluation, to adopt Nimbus Control as Nestlé's global BPM platform. "There's almost unlimited potential", he said,"because continuous improvement is baked into our culture." 

Anne Salétes from Novartis on how Nimbus Control is enabling process improvement in the most challenging regulatory environment by providing end-to-end visibility. "We are all talking about - and challenging - the same perspective on our clinical operations processes. Our people working in clinical trials are, naturally, very precise.  What we are doing is helping them to see the big picture as well. So we can see how we can improve - and show our regulators that we are efficient and managing the risks." 

The funniest moment, for me at least: Richard Parker, co-Founder of Nimbus, talking about the company's evolution within the SAP landscape, and noting that: "We're not just going around helping the victims of SAP implementations any more."  (Images of ambulance-chasing to get to the scene of an implementation and help to restore the vitals of the enterprise fast...)

But I can't neglect to mention the Guide Dogs video, which was hugely inspiring. I happened to meet a delegate from the conference on the train on the way home (as I wrote this - she recognised my conference badge!) - and it was the Guide Dogs, and Naturally 7, that she wanted to talk about.    

Related Posts

11 Aug 2011    Why Management 2.0 Will Be Built Upon BPM

02 Aug 2011    BPM: The Invisible Gorilla

 

BPM - The Foundation For Operational Excellence

Looking in on rehearsal presentations for Inspiring Performance 2011 next week, it's interesting to see how operational excellence is coming to the fore - and how BPM is central to it. 

Agreed, operational excellence sounds worthy but boring (though execs at UBS might be wishing that they'd paid it more attention).

Agreed too that, while it's a widely used term, there's only a loose consensus on what operational excellence actually means (even the Wikipedia entry includes an appeal for help).

But, however it's defined, or branded within the organization, it's an unqualified good.  Every COO wants it. What's less obvious to many organizations though is how operational excellence is directly linked with Business Process Management.

BPM in its IT incarnation - let's call it 'micro-BPM' - is focussed on automation.  But BPM in its wider sense - 'macro-BPM' - is about operational excellence.  And, in global organizations across every sector, a macro-BPM platform is emerging the essential foundation for operational excellence. 

Talking with clients and colleagues since our first attempt, back in January, to define how you do operational excellence in practice, we've converged on four closely-related capabilities: 

To achieve operational excellence, the enterprise needs the capability...

to understand the whole.  To maintain a complete, holistic and integrated model of the business - including what's automated and what's not, what's outsourced and what's in-house.

to flawlessly execute strategy as end-to-end operational processes. To maintain two-way line of sight between strategy and operating reality.

to continually re-optimize performance by integrating metrics and analytics with end-to-end operational processes and providing the framework for the entire enterprise to collaborate on continuous improvement.

to manage risks, controls, quality and compliance together, within one enterprise-wide and real-time governance framework.

Cue the enterprise-wide BPM platform: the essential enabler for all of these capabilities, and therefore for operational excellence. More on this, after the conference...

Related Posts

07 Sep 2011    The Social Enterprise: Don't All Speak At Once

11 Aug 2011    Why Management 2.0 Will Be Built Upon BPM