« When 'Social' BPM Gets Over-Familiar | Main | Now That's What I Call BPM! »

11 February 2011

Comments

Marco Brambilla

Let me add another strong candidate here:
question and discussion "How big is a process?" on eBizQ.

http://www.ebizq.net/blogs/ebizq_forum/2011/02/how-big-is-a-process.php?utm_source=feedburner

Useful as aking "How long is a piece of string?" as someone pointed out :-).

Bruce Silver

Mike,
If the global climate were indeed impacted by BPM blogger hot air, you would probably be under UN sanctions yourself. Your second "award" about self-serving comments by tool vendors is particularly nervy, as you do not disclose the fact that you are tool vendor that uses a proprietary notation rather than the BPMN standard.
Bruce Silver

Mike Gammage

@Bruce - LOL.

But I must clarify, just in case others reading your comment don't realise: the Nimbus UPN notation (freely available to download from the Nimbus website) is simply what we've learned, from more than a decade of experience with many thousands of clients, about how best to describe processes in a way that the whole business can understand and embrace in day-to-day operations, and yet has the rigor required for compliance and governance purposes.

Again, as you know but others may not - Nimbus Control supports BPMN 1.1 and offers the possibility of a hybrid enterprise process model. It's a complete and integrated process perspective. The higher levels use UPN (or any other means of describing process that the organization chooses) but the lower levels, where automation comes into play, and the audience may be primarily IT, can be in BPMN.

Mike

The comments to this entry are closed.

Shangri-La:

'utopian earthly paradise, permanently happy land'

- Wikipedia

Bookmark and Share

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

My Photo